The LS-324C is a midsize tripod from Leofoto’s portable “Ranger” line. It is bulky enough that I have categorized it as ‘All Purpose’, but this could easily be used as a travel tripod. It is lighter and more compact than many of the tripods I have characterized as such. This is largely a result of the design not including a center column, and having no provision for one. This is a recipe for success in my rankings, by shedding weight and boosting stiffness. As we will see, this makes the LS-324C one of the best value tripods I have tested.
|Yaw Stiffness||674 +/- 4 Nm/rad|
|Yaw Damping||0.337 +/- 0.034 Js/rad|
|Pitch Stiffness||2922 +/- 17 Nm/rad|
|Pitch Damping||0.79 +/- 0.079 Js/rad|
|Weight||3.06 lbs (1.39 kgs)|
|Manufacturer weight rating||33 lbs|
|Maximum Height||51.3 in (130.3 cm)|
|Minimum Height||3.1 in (7.9 cm)|
|Base Diameter||2.0 in (5.1 cm)|
|Folded Length||18.9 in (48.0 cm)|
|Folded Circumference||10.0 in (25.4 cm)|
|Folded Volume||150.0 cu. in. (2.5 liters)|
|Leg Material||Carbon Fiber|
|Primary Leg Angle||21.5 deg|
|Top Tube Diameter||32.5 mm|
|Second Tube Diameter||28.0 mm|
|Third Tube Diameter||25.0 mm|
|Fourth Tube Diameter||22.0 mm|
The test results are included here as I consider them to be part of the tripod’s specification. For full discussion of the stiffness and damping, see the test results page of the review.
The first thing that we notice is the relatively low weight of the tripod. As said above, this makes the LS-324C an easy tripod to travel with. Unfortunately the height is on the short side as well. Most people won’t be able to get the camera to eye level. If you shoot using a tilting screen, this isn’t an issue. Otherwise, using this tripod will require some hunching over to look through the viewfinder. The design of the tripod precludes the use of a center column, so that can’t save the day here either.
The leg angle of the LS-324C is 21.5 degrees. I consider 25 degrees to be ideal, and 22.5 to be the low end of the acceptable range. 21.5 degrees begins to make the tripod both less stiff and more prone to tipping over. The LS-324C tests well in stiffness despite the too narrow leg angle, which only begs us to ask “How good could this tripod have been?” Based on the stiffness vs leg angle research, I estimate that the answer is about 15% stiffer if it had been built with a 25 degree leg angle. Of course it would have been a couple inches shorter as well. Narrowing the leg angle is a way that manufacturers try to increase the height of the tripod without increasing the weight or bill of materials cost. Clearly I wish they didn’t.
What’s in the Box?